Even otherwise peaceful protest is now illegal...are we now living in the former Soviet Union?
| By Doc - Nov 26th, 2006 at 10:54 pm EST |
Comments |
Mail to a Friend
Categories: Equality / Civil Rights, Consumer and Worker Protection, Corporate Accountability / Workers' Rights, Crime & Penal Reform
Categories: Equality / Civil Rights, Consumer and Worker Protection, Corporate Accountability / Workers' Rights, Crime & Penal Reform
What special interest is best served by this new law...I wonder!
From the ASPCA website:
Federal: Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act passes in the House!
Bill No.: H.R. 4239
Primary Sponsors: Representative Thomas Petri (WI-6)
ASPCA Position: Oppose
Action Needed: None
Update, November 13, 2006: We are sorry to report that the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act has passed in the House of Representatives. The bill will now be presented to the President for his signature prior to being passed into law. Thank you to all who have supported our efforts to defeat this bill.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H.R. 4239, the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA), is a bill that could make it a crime punishable by imprisonment to cause any business classified as an "animal enterprise" to suffer a loss of profit--even if the company's financial decline is the result of legal activities, such as peaceful protests, consumer boycotts or media campaigns. The term "animal enterprise" would include manufacturers, distributors and sellers of animals or animal products, research facilities, pet stores, breeders, zoos, rodeos, circuses, and animal shelters and the like.
While the ASPCA strongly opposes acts of violence, including vandalism, property damage and trespass, this bill threatens to criminalize as "terrorism" otherwise lawful, constitutionally protected acts often utilized by citizens and organizations to effect change. Lawful and peaceful protests that, for example, urge a consumer boycott of a company that does not use humane procedures, could be the target of this provision if the activity resulted in economic damage to the company.
The bill would also make it illegal to expose cruel conditions at facilities such as puppy mills and research labs, if exposure of such conditions--even if done lawfully--would result in economic damage to the animal enterprise. There is no exemption in the bill to exclude "economic damage" that results from the disclosure of information about a company's treatment of animals, which is disclosed through public information.
From the ASPCA website:
Federal: Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act passes in the House!
Bill No.: H.R. 4239
Primary Sponsors: Representative Thomas Petri (WI-6)
ASPCA Position: Oppose
Action Needed: None
Update, November 13, 2006: We are sorry to report that the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act has passed in the House of Representatives. The bill will now be presented to the President for his signature prior to being passed into law. Thank you to all who have supported our efforts to defeat this bill.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H.R. 4239, the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA), is a bill that could make it a crime punishable by imprisonment to cause any business classified as an "animal enterprise" to suffer a loss of profit--even if the company's financial decline is the result of legal activities, such as peaceful protests, consumer boycotts or media campaigns. The term "animal enterprise" would include manufacturers, distributors and sellers of animals or animal products, research facilities, pet stores, breeders, zoos, rodeos, circuses, and animal shelters and the like.
While the ASPCA strongly opposes acts of violence, including vandalism, property damage and trespass, this bill threatens to criminalize as "terrorism" otherwise lawful, constitutionally protected acts often utilized by citizens and organizations to effect change. Lawful and peaceful protests that, for example, urge a consumer boycott of a company that does not use humane procedures, could be the target of this provision if the activity resulted in economic damage to the company.
The bill would also make it illegal to expose cruel conditions at facilities such as puppy mills and research labs, if exposure of such conditions--even if done lawfully--would result in economic damage to the animal enterprise. There is no exemption in the bill to exclude "economic damage" that results from the disclosure of information about a company's treatment of animals, which is disclosed through public information.
Comments are closed for this post.
Link
We should chalk this one up to the dark legacy of the Republican Congress. Clearly a piece of corporate protectionism that ignores free speach.
Once again, the Republicans show that they are more concerned with protecting profits than Consitutional Rights.
Crooked bastards.