CD-5 Republican nominee, Doug Lamborn, stops Colorado crime bill to stop teachers from cross-dressing
| By NoWMDs - Aug 9th, 2006 at 10:17 am EDT |
| Also listed in: Denver County |
Comments |
Mail to a Friend
Categories: Equality / Civil Rights, Civil Liberties / Privacy, Crime & Penal Reform, Religion, Reproductive Rights
Categories: Equality / Civil Rights, Civil Liberties / Privacy, Crime & Penal Reform, Religion, Reproductive Rights
Happy post-primaries. I thought I'd focus a little attention on the Republican side.
Republican Doug Lamborn will be running against Democrat Jay Fawcett in Colorados' Congressional District 5.
Colorado Politics asked Lamborn some questions in June 2005:
Lamborn seems to have an anti-homosexual fetish much like Marilyn Musgrave:
During the recent primary, the Lamborn campaign was accused by another Republican campaign of coordinating with two conservative political action committees and sending political mailers to voters alleging Republican Lionel Rivera backed ''the radical homosexual lobby.'' This started a firestorm as the Republican primary candidates all shouted I hate homosexuals more than you.
No bones about it; Lamborn is a Musgrave clone (anti-equal rights, anti-choice, anti-science, shove his religion down your throat, your not a Republican unless your MY kind of Republican conservative). Of course, Lamborn is is against stem cell research, so he cannot actually be a clone.
Support Jay Fawcett in Concressional District 5.
Republican Doug Lamborn will be running against Democrat Jay Fawcett in Colorados' Congressional District 5.
Colorado Politics asked Lamborn some questions in June 2005:
In the last session you tried to use a procedural move to stop a vote on a crimes bill (eventually allowed to become law by Governor Owens), and you attempted to introduce an amendment to allow school districts to ban employees from dressing as a member of the opposite sex.
Lamborn seems to have an anti-homosexual fetish much like Marilyn Musgrave:
There are those who would argue that gay rights are a civil rights and anti-discrimination issue, and thus should not be something that falls under governmental restrictions. How do you argue against this position that the government should not be restricting the rights of certain individuals over the rights of others? Is this counterintuitive to the smaller government argument, and if not, how do you make an argument for both smaller government and anti-gay rights?
Lamborn: I just think that everyone should be treated alike -- special rights for none and equal rights for all.
During the recent primary, the Lamborn campaign was accused by another Republican campaign of coordinating with two conservative political action committees and sending political mailers to voters alleging Republican Lionel Rivera backed ''the radical homosexual lobby.'' This started a firestorm as the Republican primary candidates all shouted I hate homosexuals more than you.
No bones about it; Lamborn is a Musgrave clone (anti-equal rights, anti-choice, anti-science, shove his religion down your throat, your not a Republican unless your MY kind of Republican conservative). Of course, Lamborn is is against stem cell research, so he cannot actually be a clone.
Support Jay Fawcett in Concressional District 5.
Comments are closed for this post.