The IV Amendment and the 1803 Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Ruling
| By Mike Crowe - Feb 10th, 2006 at 3:18 pm EST |
The 4th Amendment does not leave "wiggle room" for our Government and its agents to search and seize without a sworn warrant. And as the President and his agents can aquire legal warrants quickly, securely, and secretly there is no excuse not to obtains the necessary warrants.
The 1803 Supreme Court ruled in the Marbury v. Madison case that "an act of Congress is null and void when it conflicts with provisions of the US Constitution.". This was one of the most important, if not the most important ruling that the Supreme Court ever made, for it rules that the US Constitution is the preimere law of the land.
It matters little, the machinatations that the President and his agents go through, to subvert the IV Amendment for their own use. The IV Amendment is a clearly written declartative sentence that, really, cannot be tarnished.
The 1803 Supreme Court ruled in the Marbury v. Madison case that "an act of Congress is null and void when it conflicts with provisions of the US Constitution.". This was one of the most important, if not the most important ruling that the Supreme Court ever made, for it rules that the US Constitution is the preimere law of the land.
It matters little, the machinatations that the President and his agents go through, to subvert the IV Amendment for their own use. The IV Amendment is a clearly written declartative sentence that, really, cannot be tarnished.
Comments are closed for this post.