Join the Network!  
ProgressNow Colorado
Let them be taxed
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

If ministers want to endorse political candidates then their ministries should be taxed because they have become active political organizations that are partisan in nature and by extension adjuncts to any political campaign and political party.

Laurie Goldstein, New York Times, writes:

The protest, called Pulpit Freedom Sunday, was organized by the Alliance Defense Fund, a consortium of Christian lawyers that fights for conservative religious and social causes. When the fund first announced the protest this year, it said it planned to have 50 ministers taking part. As of Thursday it said it had hundreds of volunteers, but had selected only 33 who were fully aware of the risks and benefits...

Erik Stanley, senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, said: “This is not something these churches want to do in secrecy and hiding. In fact, they don’t believe they’re doing anything wrong. They don’t believe they’re violating the law.

“What they’re doing is talking to their congregations about biblical issues related to candidates and elections, and they believe they have the constitutional right to do that.”

The protest is challenging an amendment to the tax code passed by Congress in 1954 saying that charitable organizations known as 501(c)(3)’s, which accept tax-deductible contributions, cannot intervene in political campaigns. The legislation was intended to prevent nonprofit organizations from funneling money and resources to political candidates....

Clearly the Alliance Defense Fund's lawyers are inducing ministers to undermine tax laws.  The New York Times article continues:

Three former I.R.S. officials, now lawyers in a Washington firm, recently sent a letter to the I.R.S.’s Office of Professional Responsibility urging that the Alliance Defense Fund and its lawyers be investigated for “inducing churches to engage in conduct designed to violate federal tax law in a direct and blatant matter.”

 


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

No comments have been written yet.
Highest Rated All Network Posts

America

Posted Mar 20, 2010 8:04am
Comments (0)

If Bennet is doing such a bad job...

Posted Mar 20, 2010 2:58am
Comments (2)

Time to Call on Payday Lending Reform

Posted Mar 17, 2010 11:59am
Comments (0)

The Tea Party is over

Posted Mar 16, 2010 7:57am
Comments (0)

Colorado Unemployment Insurance gotchas

Posted Mar 16, 2010 7:03am
Comments (1)

Who is pulling Jane Norton's strings?

Posted Mar 15, 2010 12:26pm
Comments (0)

Rep. Alan Grayson's 4-page bill -- Medicare Buy-In As Public Option

Posted Mar 14, 2010 6:40pm
Comments (0)

Colorado Citizens, Businesses Reject Amazon's Bullying

Posted Mar 11, 2010 11:10am
Comments (2)

Save the Polar Bear in Your Bedroom

Posted Mar 10, 2010 9:26am
Comments (0)

Don't let Amazon.com push Colorado around

Posted Mar 09, 2010 3:30pm
Comments (12)

* NOTE: ProgressNow Colorado is not responsible for the content of member postings.



Search Blog

Make a Donation
Find People
Find Groups
Find Events
Write Officials
Join our group on FacebookFollow us on TwitterProgressive JobwireProgressNow State Partner Colorado Blogs

National Blogs

1536 Wynkoop St., #4A, Denver, CO 80202 | ph: (303) 991-1900 | fax: (303) 991-1902 | progress@progressnowcolorado.org

© 2005-2009 ProgressNow Colorado, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Fair Use Statement. Terms of Service.