Join the Network!  
ProgressNow Colorado
Who's your Daddy?
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

Well, well it is with the dead-enders like Generals Patraeous and Odinero and Secretary Gates that Obama has to deal with on the issue of keeping a promise to the people or siding with them on Iraq.  Inter Press Service (h/t to Huffingtonpost.com) reports:

Petraeus, Gates and Odierno had hoped to sell Obama on a plan that they formulated in the final months of the Bush administration that aimed at getting around a key provision of the U.S.-Iraqi withdrawal agreement signed envisioned re-categorising large numbers of combat troops as support troops. That subterfuge was by the United States last November while ostensibly allowing Obama to deliver on his campaign promise.

There is only one president as Obama told the nation when he was president-elect.  There is only one commander-in-chief and his name is Barack Obama not George W. Bush.  What we, the people, have to do now is to call or write the White House in support of Obama's command to the nation's top military to have a withdrawl plan for 16 months of military forces from Iraq.  

The nation's military commanders and dead ender Gates should not be doing this:

There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama's decision.

If the military and civilian commanders cannot follow an order then they should resign.  

From the report:

A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, "Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama."

Those commanders should remember a past general and president:  President Truman and General MacArthur.

 


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Only Part of the Process
By Ralph T Feb 2nd 2009 at 12:30 pm EST (Updated Feb 2nd 2009 at 12:30 pm EST)
Unquestioning obedience is a mis-representation of the extensive obligations of the senior military officers and Secretary of Defense required by law (Goldwater-Nichols Act) to advise and analyze defense issues and policies for the President. Sorry, but this effectively means that the partisan political campaign pressures of camapigning may have to defer to facts and the strategic best interests of the Nation.

Gates and the generals have a legal obligation to present all relevant facts, altenative courses of action, benefits and consequences (to the second and third order of effects) to the President. Then it's his decision how to decide on a US military policy in Iraq that balances effective and orderly withdrawal, with no permanent residual military presence, against pressures to abandon Billions of dollars worth of vital equipment and still fragile political and social institutions before the time is right.
Re: Only Part of the Process
By Ken Feb 2nd 2009 at 1:21 pm EST (Updated Feb 2nd 2009 at 1:21 pm EST)
The problem of Iraq is that the military side of the equation is only a part of the whole problem. What has been consistently left out of the media debate here is that the people of Iraq want to have no foreigners running their country.

Public opinion polling done in Iraq over the last five years has shown that Iraqis want the US military and mercenaries out. "Insurgent" forces that operate in Iraq still enjoy popular support.

The question is when, not if, will Iraqi military forces take the matter into it's own hands.
Re: Only Part of the Process
By Ralph T Feb 5th 2009 at 3:55 pm EST (Updated Feb 5th 2009 at 3:55 pm EST)
Iraq's civil institutions are severely lacking to support the installation of strong democratically elected governments at all levels. There remains a strong current (well, more realistically a tidal current) of near feudalism eminating from the sheiks, and destructive influences from radical clerics seeking little more than engratiation from eastern (Iranian) sponsors.

It's been a great sound-bite for years now, but simply abandoning Iraq by pulling-out the US Armed Forces is not a comprehensive solution. All Iraqi and international factors beyond purely military action must be strengthened.
  
Highest Rated All Network Posts

Lessons from a Quagmire

Posted Nov 21, 2009 12:25am
Comments (0)

Saturday Mailbag: Friday Edition

Posted Nov 20, 2009 6:08pm
Comments (0)

A battlefield in the courtroom

Posted Nov 20, 2009 4:23pm
Comments (1)

Signs of hate, right here in Denver

Posted Nov 20, 2009 1:03pm
Comments (1)

HHS Task Force Mammogram Recs Slammed

Posted Nov 19, 2009 8:52am
Comments (0)

Toddler teacher convicted for DUI on 0.00 breathalyzer and negative drug test - Adams County Justice

Posted Nov 15, 2009 2:52pm
Comments (0)

Got Defense?

Posted Nov 15, 2009 9:41am
Comments (0)

Dave Schultheis is the Worst Person in the World

Posted Nov 12, 2009 5:29pm
Comments (1)

What McInnis might say

Posted Nov 12, 2009 7:23am
Comments (0)

Veteran's Day 2009

Posted Nov 11, 2009 8:38pm
Comments (0)

* NOTE: ProgressNow Colorado is not responsible for the content of member postings.



Search Blog

Make a Donation
Find People
Find Groups
Find Events
Write Officials
Join our group on FacebookFollow us on TwitterProgressive JobwireProgressNow State Partner Colorado Blogs

National Blogs

1536 Wynkoop St., #4A, Denver, CO 80202 | ph: (303) 991-1900 | fax: (303) 991-1902 | progress@progressnowcolorado.org

© 2005-2009 ProgressNow Colorado, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Fair Use Statement. Terms of Service.