Join the Network!  
ProgressNow Colorado
Post from Open for Discussion:
Stop the Peru-U.S. “Free Trade Agreement”
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

With the presidential primary season kicking into high gear, both Democrats and Republicans are increasingly nervous about taking unpopular positions.

And what could be more unpopular than supporting NAFTA expansion deals that will offshore more good U.S. jobs, trash the environment, jack up medicine prices, threaten food safety and impoverish millions of small farmers in Latin America - driving new waves of desperate immigration?

But politicians in both parties also are eager to hoover up donations from multinational corporations and the other special interests who benefit at our expense from NAFTA style deals. So, the Senate Finance Committee has quietly decided to test the waters on NAFTA expansion by holding a hearing tomorrow to kick off the process towards passing the Peru NAFTA expansion - formally called the U.S.-Peru Free Trade Agreement (FTA).

All four of the pending NAFTA expansions to Peru, Panama, Colombia and South Korea were sunk - thanks to your activism - until a backroom deal on May 10th by some Democratic trade leaders. The deal added improved labor standards to the Bush-negotiated NAFTA expansions. Yet, the deal did not remove any of the core NAFTA provisions that are the main cause of job loss and wage drops here, cause the displacement of small farmers in our trade partner countries, and empower foreign investors to attack our basic health and environmental laws in foreign tribunals.

Outrageously, in the midst of the imported food safety crisis, NAFTA-expansions like those to Peru and Panama will worsen imported food and product safety problems.

And, unbelievably, the U.S.-Peru FTA would lock in Social Security privatization in Peru, even as Democratic presidential candidates compete to see who can make stronger promises to protect against privatization here at home.

Not surprisingly, not a single union in the U.S. supports the deal or the resulting NAFTA expansions. Also opposing is Oxfam and an array of environmental, faith, consumer and family farm groups. And, the two major labor federations in Peru have just sent a letter to Democrats in the U.S. Congress, urging them to reject the agreement.

In their own letter to Congress (PDF), prominent U.S. Latino groups have called on Congress to stop Bush's NAFTA expansion - expressing concerns that the U.S.-Peru FTA will reduce rural incomes in Peru and increase the pressure on impoverished Peruvians to migrate - legally or illegally - to the United States.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

No comments have been written yet.
Highest Rated All Network Posts

Lessons from a Quagmire

Posted Nov 21, 2009 12:25am
Comments (0)

Saturday Mailbag: Friday Edition

Posted Nov 20, 2009 6:08pm
Comments (0)

A battlefield in the courtroom

Posted Nov 20, 2009 4:23pm
Comments (1)

Signs of hate, right here in Denver

Posted Nov 20, 2009 1:03pm
Comments (1)

HHS Task Force Mammogram Recs Slammed

Posted Nov 19, 2009 8:52am
Comments (0)

Toddler teacher convicted for DUI on 0.00 breathalyzer and negative drug test - Adams County Justice

Posted Nov 15, 2009 2:52pm
Comments (0)

Got Defense?

Posted Nov 15, 2009 9:41am
Comments (0)

Dave Schultheis is the Worst Person in the World

Posted Nov 12, 2009 5:29pm
Comments (1)

What McInnis might say

Posted Nov 12, 2009 7:23am
Comments (0)

Veteran's Day 2009

Posted Nov 11, 2009 8:38pm
Comments (0)

* NOTE: ProgressNow Colorado is not responsible for the content of member postings.



Search Blog

Make a Donation
Find People
Find Groups
Find Events
Write Officials
Join our group on FacebookFollow us on TwitterProgressive JobwireProgressNow State Partner Colorado Blogs

National Blogs

1536 Wynkoop St., #4A, Denver, CO 80202 | ph: (303) 991-1900 | fax: (303) 991-1902 | progress@progressnowcolorado.org

© 2005-2009 ProgressNow Colorado, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Fair Use Statement. Terms of Service.