Join the Network!  
ProgressNow Colorado
Post from Aquarian Conspiracy:
EDM Newsletter
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
The Incredible Shrinking National Security Gap

by Ruy Teixeira



While it is way too soon to say the Democrats are out of the woods on this one (see, for example, the results of the latest CBS News poll,
which still show the Democrats with considerable ground to make up in
several national security-related areas), it is nevertheless striking
just how much the GOP's formerly crushing advantage on national
security and handling terrorism has been shrinking.



Exhibit A in this regard is the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll.
In this poll, Democrats actually have a one point advantage over the
GOP (46-45) on handling the "U.S. campaign against terrorism"--a
stunning improvement over the 36-point deficit Democrats faced in
December 2002 (61-25 percent).



Another example of this trend is the most recent Ipsos-AP poll,
where the Democrats are in a tie with Republicans (41-41) on "Who do
you trust to do a better job of protecting the country" (41-41).
Finally, consider this very interesting question asked by
Garin-Hart-Yang Research for the DSCC:



Suppose for a moment that you were deciding your vote for Congress
SOLELY on the question of who you trusted more to protect America's
national security and have the right policies for combating terrorism.
If this were the ONLY issue you were considering, would you be more
likely to vote for a Democrat or a Republican?



The result: 41 percent said they'd vote for the Democrat and only 39
percent for the Republican. Somehow I don't think this would have been
the response a year or two ago.



If the GOP loses the national security card, what do they have left?
What indeed. As GOP pollster Tony Fabrizio recently said, referencing
the Ipsos-AP results: "These numbers are scary. We've lost every
advantage we've ever had. The good news is Democrats don't have much of
a plan. The bad news is they may not need one."



And what if Democrats did actually have a compelling plan on, say,
national security? Fabrizio does not address this possibility, but
presumably that would mean even bigger trouble for his party. Stay
tuned: the saga of the incredible shrinking national security gap may
not be over yet.




Posted by EDM staff at 10:53 AM | link

 


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

No comments have been written yet.
Highest Rated All Network Posts

Lessons from a Quagmire

Posted Nov 21, 2009 12:25am
Comments (0)

Saturday Mailbag: Friday Edition

Posted Nov 20, 2009 6:08pm
Comments (1)

A battlefield in the courtroom

Posted Nov 20, 2009 4:23pm
Comments (1)

Signs of hate, right here in Denver

Posted Nov 20, 2009 1:03pm
Comments (1)

HHS Task Force Mammogram Recs Slammed

Posted Nov 19, 2009 8:52am
Comments (0)

Toddler teacher convicted for DUI on 0.00 breathalyzer and negative drug test - Adams County Justice

Posted Nov 15, 2009 2:52pm
Comments (0)

Got Defense?

Posted Nov 15, 2009 9:41am
Comments (0)

Dave Schultheis is the Worst Person in the World

Posted Nov 12, 2009 5:29pm
Comments (1)

What McInnis might say

Posted Nov 12, 2009 7:23am
Comments (0)

Veteran's Day 2009

Posted Nov 11, 2009 8:38pm
Comments (0)

* NOTE: ProgressNow Colorado is not responsible for the content of member postings.



Search Blog

Make a Donation
Find People
Find Groups
Find Events
Write Officials
Join our group on FacebookFollow us on TwitterProgressive JobwireProgressNow State Partner Colorado Blogs

National Blogs

1536 Wynkoop St., #4A, Denver, CO 80202 | ph: (303) 991-1900 | fax: (303) 991-1902 | progress@progressnowcolorado.org

© 2005-2009 ProgressNow Colorado, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Fair Use Statement. Terms of Service.