Join the Network!  
ProgressNow Colorado
Longmont LifeBridge
People interested in continuing the fight against the irresponsible LifeBridge annexation.

The good folks up in Longmont are still working to establish open space on their eastern boarder as well as make sure the 4C/LifeBridge development doesn't cost their taxpayers millions of dollars.

From the Longmont Times-Call:


LONGMONT — Firestone and Longmont leaders might be ready to start negotiating an end to their border war.

Firestone Mayor Chad Auer gave a letter to Longmont Mayor Roger Lange on Tuesday pitching a possible deal that could end two months of wrangling over land on Longmont’s eastern boundary.

In the letter, Auer outlines a plan to allow Firestone to annex LifeBridge Christian Church’s Union property but still allow Longmont to keep a buffer between Firestone and Longmont.

It’s our best work to date. I really feel like it has a lot of win-wins in there,” Auer said Wednesday.

LifeBridge’s business organization, 4C, is willing to negotiate with Longmont to sell the church’s 120-acre parcel — land that surrounds the former Concepts Direct building on the northwest corner of Colo. Highway 119 and Fairview Street — to the city as open space, Auer wrote.

If the city buys that land from LifeBridge, then Dale Bruns and the six other owners of the Firelight Park parcel across the street — on the northeast corner — would be willing to negotiate to sell their 74 acres to Longmont, Auer said.

And if Longmont buys Firelight Park, the current owners also would be willing to drop their plans to annex into Firestone, Auer wrote.

But Longmont would need to halt its current efforts to annex right of way along Colo. 119 and Weld County Road 26, Auer wrote, “and agree not to pursue any further annexations or actions that will hinder the ability of the Union property to potentially be annexed or developed within Firestone.”

The owners of Firelight Park applied in February to annex into Firestone. LifeBridge’s application to annex its planned 350-acre Union development into Firestone followed within weeks.

Longmont leaders in turn took steps to keep Firestone town limits from reaching Longmont’s eastern edge.

...read the rest here.


It is a bit confusing, so the folks over at
What's In It for Longmont have more.
How foolish it was to oppose annexation of Union in Longmont. Those of us that were in favor made the case that if Longmont didn't annex, someone would. And that's EXACTLY what's going to happen. Now, the development will go as planned...and Longmont won't get a cent of the sales tax revenue. Firestone's trustees can see what amazing potential this development has. Shame on us, and how naive of the anti-union group to think that if they could stop Longmont from annexing, that the developers would just give up on the idea. Way to go...if Longmont had annexed, not only would we have gotten the tax revenue, but we'd also have had a say in the design of the development AND we would have been able to keep space between our town and our neigbors. Now, we'll have another city camping on our doorstep. Nice job, you all should be VERY proud.
The fabulous What's In It for Longmont grassroots effort did it!

LifeBridge will develop its Union project in Weld County
By Rachel Carter Longmont Times-Call

LONGMONT — LifeBridge Christian Church won’t be in Longmont city limits.


Congratulations to Jen Gartner, Doreen Peterson, Nita Lynch, Kaye Fissinger, Duane Leise, Karen Benker, Shari Malloy, Joan Peck, Doug Wray, and the hundreds of other volunteers who worked countless unpaid and under appreciated hours to make this happen!

This is what civic government looks like.



A big article in today's Sunday Denver Post on the Longmont LifeBridge Union annexation issue.

From the Denver Post:
Church as developer inspires skeptics
On the back cover of Rick Rusaw's book "The Externally Focused Church," a sentence in bold type asks: "How Can Your Church Get the Attention of Your Community?"

His own church, LifeBridge Christian, has gotten the attention of just about everybody in its hometown of Longmont, although not in the ways Rusaw and his co-author had in mind.

LifeBridge's proposal to build a high-end residential and retail community - on land the city was eyeing for open space - has upended Longmont's leadership and spawned a vote to halt the development's annexation.

In the process, the project has ignited a fight that has strayed well beyond the usual not-in-my-backyard angst into the uneasy territory of religious beliefs and beliefs about religion... (snip)

..."Blind faith" in a development proposal lacking in specifics is one of the main reasons Jen Gartner says she undertook what became the petition drive to let voters decide the annexation question. "

I'm not sure if they're putting more trust in this developer because it's religious-based, but to me, they are still a developer," Gartner said.


The good folks of Longmont are mounting a campaign for the January 29th, 2008 special election. They are literally doing it on a shoestring. If you'd like to help them out, join the Longmont LifeBridge group. Just click here to join: http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/group/LongmontLifeBridge

And to remind us of that, here's a good column in the Yellow Scene (a fairly new magazine for all things relating to north metro areas).

Jim Spencer (yes, that Jim Spencer, formerly of the Denver Post) does a good job of articulating the issue.  Here's a smidge to get you started.  But it's worth a full read, especially if you're new to the issue.


Separation of Church and Real Estate
However you describe LifeBridge Church's Union project, never call it the city of Longmont versus the Lord. The battle over a giant planned unit development on the outskirts of the city is not about the Almighty. It's about the almighty dollar. So when you look at the 348 acres near the intersection of Weld County roads 26 and 3 1/2, don't think separation of church and state.

Think separation of church and real estate. For good measure, toss in a city council's comeuppance from its constituents.
The LifeBridge PUD, with its 300 to 700 homes, 680,000-square-foot commercial development, 150,000-square-foot sports center, and million square feet of religious and civic use, may yet be built on what are now hay and corn fields bounded by dirt roads. But if this project is built as part of Longmont, it'll be constructed on the people's terms, not the dictates of politicians or the desires of a mega-church's development arm.

Jen Gartner and Doug Wray saw to that.

The special election in Longmont is set for January 29, 2008.  It's a mail ballot election.  If you are interested in helping on the campaign, please join our Longmont/LifeBrige group here.  Lots of important issues facing the community on this one! 

Today we made history! I just received word from Longmont City Clerk Valeria Skitt that she has validated our citizens' referendum petition on the 4C/LifeBridge annexation.

You can download the City Clerk's letter of sufficiency and validity at:

http://media.progressnowaction.org/docs/longmontpetitionok.pdf

Cheers,
Jen


Yesterday, we turned in over 6,000 signatures to the Longmont City Clerk. With this buffer, I'm hoping we'll meet the 4,021 valid signatures required to put the Union annexation back before Council, or to a public vote.

I'd like to extend my deep thanks and gratitude to everyone who followed this issue, and to everyone who helped us reach the 6,000 mark. We had over 100 petition circulators, which is incredible. The best thing is we did this all by pulling together as a community! We had no funding and we didn't pay anyone to circulate petitions. This was a real group effort to benefit our town. Thanks to all!
Longmont City Councilwoman Karen Benker wrote a good Op Ed in the Longmont Times Call today to explain why she voted no on the LifeBridge/Union 4C development annexation.

Click the article below to read the .pdf of the entire Op Ed.

From the Longmont Times Call

"To expect the public to become educated enough to make a reasonable decision...is ridiculous." ~ Longmont Mayor Julia Pirnack, quoted in the Times-Call, 9/6/2007.

It sure is nice to know that our elected officials think so highly of our cognitive abilities!
Kaye sent the text of this article in an email, but I think it's worth posting on the blog: http://www.timescall.com/Local-Story.asp?ID=3233.

City Manager Gordon Pedrow told the Council that Longmont leads Boulder County in foreclosures, commercial development is down, and the city has lost 120 primary jobs through July.

Here's a great quote from Pedrow: "If I had to give you a theme for this budget, it would be applying limited resources to address our most critical needs," Pedrow warned council members.

My question to the Council: Do those "critical needs" really include forking over money, services, and infrastructure to a land developer?

Thanks for commiting to helping us gather signatures to repeal the
LifeBridge Union annexation! We now have signing stations available.
Please contact Joan Peck (720-352-2067 or joan.peck@gmail.com) to
select your signing station location, date, and time.

A full list of signing stations is available at:
http://www.whatsinitforlongmont.org/wp/petition-signing-locations

Some stations include:

KING SOOPERS- Hover St.
Wednesdays, Sept. 5, 12, 19 & 26th, 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm
Saturday -Sept. 8 - 9:00 am to 5:00 pm

KING SOOPERS - Main St.
Mondays - Sept. 10, 17 & 24 - 3:00 to 7:00

FARMER'S MARKET - Fair Grounds
Saturday - Sept. 8th - 7:30 am to 1:00 pm (staffed)
Saturday - Sept. 15th & 22nd - 7:30 am to 1:00 pm

TASTE OF THERAPY WELLNESS FAIR - Isaac Walton Park
Saturday - Sept. 8 -10:00 am to 1:00 pm

Please contact Joan or Jen if you have any questions.  We can always
use more volunteers, so please forward this to friends, family, and
neighbors!  Thanks again for giving a voice to Longmont residents!

Cheers,

Jen

I'm sending this out to our original 880 petition signers, plus additional Longmont residents:

On August 14th, the Longmont City Council dismissed the concerns of
Longmont residents and annexed 348 acres in Weld County for the
LifeBridge/4C development. Too many questions remain unanswered! How much of the development is tax-exempt? What are the plans to
alleviate traffic congestion on CO-119? Who pays for water? Will our
schools become more overcrowded? What will happen to your property
values?

The citizens of Longmont have organized a referendum petition to
repeal the City Council's irresponsible action and get answers before
committing Longmont's taxpayers to a huge real estate development
contract.   Read More »
Great news! The Longmont City Clerk approved our referendum petition late yesterday. That means we are ready to collect signatures!!! Stay tuned for more...
Richard and Doug have updated the web page, and, it looks great! Thanks to both of you. Everyone, be sure to visit it. There is detailed information on the major issues and concerns on annexation of LifeBridge. It is important to have these facts at hand when speaking with people and gathering petition signatures for the Referendum.

The web address is: www.whatsinitforlongmont.org
Here's the email Jen Gartner sent out regarding the LifeBridge Union annexation issue in Longmont. Please join the cause and sign up to gather signatures to put this issue on the ballot in Longmont.

Dear Longmont resident,

We are contacting you because you were one of the 900+ citizens of Longmont who signed the petition asking the City Council to send the LifeBridge Union annexation to a vote of the people.  Unfortunately, the City Council chose to ignore our concerns.  We hope that you’ll join us in signing a petition that the Council cannot ignore – a citizen referendum.

The referendum petition - which is ready to go as soon as the City Clerk approves it – will force the City Council to overturn their irresponsible annexation decision or send the decision to a vote.  We’ll need to act quickly and with determination.  We must collect at least 4,021 valid signatures within 21 days (so we probably need 6,500 total signatures).  You can help by committing to one of the following options, which will be available as soon as the referendum petition is approved:   

  1. Pick up a petition for circulation. We have two petition sizes available – one with two signature pages and the other with four signature pages. The more signatures you can get the better…but it’s ok to turn in incomplete petitions. You will need to have the petition notarized before returning it to us (this can be done at your bank for no charge).

  2. Host a house party. Gather a group of friends and neighbors at your home and we’ll send a petition circulator to you. We would like to have a minimum of 10 Longmont registered voters at each house party.

  3. Sign the referendum petition at a given location. We will set up signing stations throughout the city (sites and times are TBD).

  4. Staff a petition signing station. We will staff stations in shifts.

Please let us know your commitment as soon as possible so that we’re ready to move quickly.  

Click here to sign up!

http://ProgressNowAction.org/LifeBridgeCommitment 

Let’s remind the City Council that they answer to us, the citizens of Longmont, and not to some developer or corporation.  Longmont has never seen a successful citizens’ referendum…so let’s make history together!

Thank you again for your support.

Best wishes,
Jen Gartner
jgartner@law.gwu.edu

Doreen Petersen
Doreen.Petersen@colorado.edu 

PS.  If you would like to stay informed on the latest developments on this issue, please join our online group for emails, event notifications and blog postings.  Just click the link:  www.ProgressNowAction.org/LongmontLifeBridge

Hi all,

The Times-Call and some others have reported that I'm an attorney, which is true...I graduated from the George Washington University Law School and I'm fully licensed in Maryland and DC. But I'm only partially licensed in Colorado, to practice law for my employer and on a pro bono (free) basis. I'm involved in this group as a concerned citizen, not in any sort of official attorney capacity. Just wanted to clarify so as not to run afoul of the Rules of Professional Responsibility!

Cheers,
Jen



Last week ProgressNow member Jen Gartner delivered nearly 900 petitions to the Longmont City Council asking them to vote no on the annexation of the LifeBridge/4C development. They voted 6-1 for annexation anyway.

Last night she helped organize a meeting of folks in Longmont who are organizing a citizen's initiative to get this issue on the ballot.

The Longmont Times Call wrote a very good article about this fight.

Petition started to block Union:  4,021 signatures will put measure to overturn council on ballot 

A group of Longmont residents is taking steps to overturn the Longmont City Council’s recent approval of LifeBridge Christian Church’s 348-acre Union development.

Longmont resident and attorney Jen Gartner met with about a dozen other residents Tuesday night to discuss plans to block the council’s approval of Union. 

Gartner and others from the group hope to gather enough signatures on a referendum petition to force the City Council to overturn its Aug. 14 approval or put the church’s development before voters during a special election.

The group would have to collect signatures from at least 4,021 registered Longmont voters to pass the referendum.

“The City Council did a great disservice to the whole community by potentially not understanding what they’re getting into and not getting clarity before moving forward with the annexation,” Gartner said.
 

If you are interested in helping out with this issue, please join the Longmont LifeBridge group by clicking here.  Or you can email Jen Gartner directly at jgartner@law.gwu.edu.

 

 

Our referendum effort has already made the front page of the Times-Call:
http://www.timescall.com/Local-Story.asp?ID=3072.

The meeting last night went very well. We came up with some firm action items for continuing the fight against the City Council's irresponsible decision to annex Union, which flies in the face of the City's own development plan.

The most important item right now is the referendum. The final annexation ordinance has not yet been published, although publication is expected in the new few days. As soon as the ordinance is published, the clock starts ticking...we'll have 30 calendar days to gather signatures.   Read More »
A full agenda will be available at the meeting. Here are the highlights:

WELCOME (Jen/Richard) - Brief

OVERVIEW OF LIFEBRIDGE CONNECTIONS & CONFLICTS - 15 minutes
City Council (Open)
City's Planning Department (Richard)
ERO Resources (Kaye)
Council for National Policy (Kaye)
Weld County Commissioners (Open)
4C Corporation (Richard)   Read More »
For the referendum, there seems to be some debate on the deadline for signatures. We have 30 days from the date the Council's formal decision is published. Apparently the City Council publishes their minutes 2 weeks after the date of the meeting, but I don't know if that counts as "formal publication" of their ordinance. Karen Benker seems to think we have only 30 days from August 14th. If anyone has firm knowledge about this, please let me know.

The City Clerk needs to draft the summary for the referendum petition. I've provided the following as a proposed summary:

"This Citizen Initiative and Referendum will void the City Council's August 14, 2007 decision to approve the LifeBridge Union Annexation and its related development plans and will send the annexation decision to a vote of Longmont residents."   Read More »
Posts By Month
2008

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2007

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

Highest Rated All Network Posts

A battlefield in the courtroom

Posted Nov 20, 2009 4:23pm
Comments (1)

Signs of hate, right here in Denver

Posted Nov 20, 2009 1:03pm
Comments (1)

HHS Task Force Mammogram Recs Slammed

Posted Nov 19, 2009 8:52am
Comments (0)

Toddler teacher convicted for DUI on 0.00 breathalyzer and negative drug test - Adams County Justice

Posted Nov 15, 2009 2:52pm
Comments (0)

Got Defense?

Posted Nov 15, 2009 9:41am
Comments (0)

Dave Schultheis is the Worst Person in the World

Posted Nov 12, 2009 5:29pm
Comments (1)

What McInnis might say

Posted Nov 12, 2009 7:23am
Comments (0)

Veteran's Day 2009

Posted Nov 11, 2009 8:38pm
Comments (0)

Vincent Carroll: No Anti-Muslim backlash

Posted Nov 11, 2009 12:47pm
Comments (0)

War Music for Veteran's Day

Posted Nov 10, 2009 10:34am
Comments (0)

* NOTE: ProgressNow Colorado is not responsible for the content of member postings.



Search Blog

Make a Donation
Find People
Find Groups
Find Events
Write Officials
Join our group on FacebookFollow us on TwitterProgressive JobwireProgressNow State Partner Colorado Blogs

National Blogs

1536 Wynkoop St., #4A, Denver, CO 80202 | ph: (303) 991-1900 | fax: (303) 991-1902 | progress@progressnowcolorado.org

© 2005-2009 ProgressNow Colorado, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Fair Use Statement. Terms of Service.