Join the Network!  
ProgressNow Colorado

Another black eye for Colorado by Mr. Tancredo:

“At some point, state and local officials and individuals have got to step up to the plate and take some initiative,” said Tancredo. “The mentality that people can wait around indefinitely for the federal taxpayer to solve all their worldly problems has got to come to an end.”

 Read the rest here.

 Just like the three Republican state representatives who went to the Mexican border to show "solidarity" with the racist Minutemen.

 

The poor have been left out of the Republican public policies like hurricane relief efforts. MediaMatters.org has found this:

On the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina's August 29, 2005, landfall, the media have largely ignored reports that Mississippi Republican Gov. Haley Barbour, leading the recovery effort in the state, has repeatedly sought, and obtained, waivers from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) allowing the state to spend federal funds that would normally be reserved for low- to moderate-income residents on other projects. As a consequence, just 20 percent of the $5.4 billion in Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) awarded to the state has been earmarked for programs designed to benefit Mississippi's low- to moderate-income Katrina victims -- less than half of the 50 percent requirement mandated by Congress, according to a recent report by the Steps Coalition, an organization that monitors the Mississippi Homeowners Assistance Program. Moreover, the $1.1 billion in federal funds that have been earmarked for programs benefiting lower income residents have been distributed very slowly. As the Biloxi Sun-Herald reported on August 26, the Steps Coalition said the program has been deficient in "helping people of low-to-moderate incomes." Furthermore, investigative journalist Tim Shorrock wrote in an August 29 Salon.com article that the distribution of federal funding in Mississippi under Barbour "has been badly skewed toward wealthy homeowners."
Read the rest here and then forward it to all your media contacts in CO.

By short changing the working class there will be no working class housing for people to do the rich and white people's necessary support services.

Welcome to Pottersville:  The Republican fantasy land of privatization for all.

How Bush Allowed an Army of For-Profit Contractors to Invade the U.S. Treasury
--From Issue 1034

 

Posted Aug 23, 2007 8:51 AM

How is it done? How do you screw the taxpayer for millions, get away with it and then ride off into the sunset with one middle finger extended, the other wrapped around a chilled martini? Ask Earnest O. Robbins -- he knows all about being a successful contractor in Iraq.

You start off as a well-connected bureaucrat: in this case, as an Air Force civil engineer, a post from which Robbins was responsible for overseeing 70,000 servicemen and contractors, with an annual budget of $8 billion. You serve with distinction for thirty-four years, becoming such a military all-star that the Air Force frequently sends you to the Hill to testify before Congress -- until one day in the summer of 2003, when you retire to take a job as an executive for Parsons, a private construction company looking to do work in Iraq.

   Read More »
..............or how I learned to live without it.

Sometimes, in more reflective moments, I wonder which is worse, Republican hypocrisy or Democratic spinelessness? It is no wonder that our standard bearers are so unattractive to Unaffiliated's and Republicans alike. I don't even like 'em. The treasury has been plundered and DeGette wants to talk about stem cells. The earth looks at the United States as the greatest threat to peace and prosperity and Mark Udall seems to have nothing to say and has the unmitigated gall to aspire to the US Senate. Ken Salazar believes that being Hispanic means never having to say you're sorry, even if everyone but him knows he's in so far over his head he makes Gonzo look like a Rhodes Scholar. Don't know about you, but I'm ashamed of the lot of them and ain't afraid to say it.

Talking to people and this is the feeling that our elected representatives are not listening to us.  I mean, DeGette is in one of the safest CD's in the nation but there is NO leadership from her on this issue of Iraq.  If there is no leadership then there will be a day of reckoning for DeGette on the fact that she has not taken a public leadership stance and have let at least her constituents know that there voices are heard and taken seriously.  From DailyKos.com, McJoan writes:

The Brian Baird experience should provide a warning note for Congressional Dems. Randy Stapilus at Ridenbaugh Press has an excellent first-hand account of the extremely tense town meeting Baird held in Vancouver on Monday.

One man seemed to place his finger on the feeling here when he compared protests about Iraq and other Bush Administration policy to a 9-1-1 call: The people have been calling 9-1-1 to report an emergency, but no one ever responds, including Congress. They have felt ignored, and now they’re furious about it. Many, clearly, had hoped for more change when a new majority was seated in Congress in January, only to find much less than they’d hoped for.

This was an unusual town hall meeting for Baird; one woman who had attended several of his meetings previously said the turnout for this one was much larger, and the tenor always had been a lot different.

The ground is shifting. Depending on how Iraq and Baird’s responses to it develop in the rest of this year, the congressman easily could wind up with a primary challenger - a serious one, backed by some of his own former supporters. Or maybe the play-out is something else. But we do know this: We’ve never seen a congressional town hall meeting so bitter and angry at the member of Congress, and that has to mean something.

Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden wrote about that the same anger, the same frustration, that he experienced at a town meetings he held earlier in the month. Every Democratic member of Congress who held town meetings this August heard this message. Are they listening?

Make them hear you. Call, fax, and e-mail your representative in Congress. If they are one of the 70 who signed on to that letter, tell them to hold strong and keep their promise. If their name is not on that letter, ask them to join with those 70 representatives and stop funding this occupation.

 

 

 

Another reason to drop AOL membership.

AOL logs on 'Dissent'
Website streams Moore-bashing documentary
By JOHN DEMPSEY

Moore

Some serious Michael Moore bashing will turn up this week on AOL's True Stories website thanks to 40 minutes of excerpts from the documentary "Manufacturing Dissent."

Web users will be able to stream the digital video at no extra cost.

Read the rest here.


BradBlog.com by Brad Friedman is best source for electronic voting issues. He has been on this issue for years now.  

Two Ohio activists have discovered that e-voting machines made by Election Systems and Software and used across the country produce time-stamped paper trails that permit the reconstruction of an election's results--including allowing voter names to be matched to their actual votes. ... Ohio law permits anyone to walk into a county election office and obtain two crucial documents: a list of voters in the order they voted, and a time-stamped list of the actual votes. "We simply take the two pieces of paper together, merge them, and then we have which voter voted and in which way," said James Moyer, a longtime privacy activist and poll worker who lives in Columbus, Ohio. ...

Moyer and fellow activist Jim Cropcho tested this by dropping by the election office of Delaware County, about 20 miles north of Columbus, and reviewing the results for a May 2006 vote to extend a property tax to fund mental retardation services (PDF). Their results indicate who voted "yes" and who voted "no"--and show that local couples (the Bennets, for instance) didn't always see eye-to-eye on the tax.
Meanwhile a University of California study has shown:

The UC study detailed a "Failure to protect ballot secrecy" in Diebold's touchscreen AccuVote TSx voting machine. They report that "Both the electronic and paper records of the Diebold AV-TSX contain enough information to compromise the secrecy of the ballot. The AV-TSX records votes in the order in which they are cast, and it records the time that each vote is cast. As a result, it is possible for election workers who have access to the electronic or paper records and who have observed the order in which individuals have cast their ballots to discover how those individuals voted."

As Mr. Friedman notes that it is not outsiders that poise a threat but it is insiders-election officials and voting machine employees- that are the real threat.  Do you think that the Republican Party will have any qualms to punish people who vote against their candidates or their pet obessions?

Back to paper and pen voting only.  Hand count by human only.

Read the rest here.


Shouldn't Denver and other CO counties follow the lead to decertify DRE equipment?

The California Secretary of State has done just that:

"Not only did ES&S sell machines to California counties that weren’t state certified, it’s clear the machines weren’t even federally certified when the company delivered them to California,” Bowen continued in the no-holds-barred statement. "While ES&S may not like California law, I expect the company to follow the law and not trample over it by selling uncertified voting equipment in this state."

She went on to add that she intends "to go after the company for the full $9.72 million in penalties allowable by law, along with the original $5 million the company took from counties’ pockets."
Read the rest here.
A big hat tip to BRADBlog.com.

Why is CO counties still using Diebold and ESS equipment?




The bamboozlement has begun in California because a whopping 40+ percent of Democrats support this measure.  Both Senators, Boxer and Feinstein, oppose this measure, and Gov. Schwartzenneger has signaled his opposition because "In principle, I don't like to change the rules in the middle of the game."

"This is a craven right-wing power grab by the Republicans to hijack the presidency on June 3, 2008. The measure, if passed, would dictate that California divide up its electoral college votes by congressional district -- resulting in the Republican theft of at least 20 electoral votes in November's general election, the equivalent of Ohio.

A powerful New York Times editorial titled "Stacking the Electoral Deck" explains that this cynical scheme by a "shadowy group" of California Republicans will "do serious damage to our democracy":
If voters understand that the initiative is essentially an elaborate dirty trick posing as reform, they are likely to vote against it. But judging by the misleading name of their organization, the initiative’s backers want to fool the public into thinking the change would make elections more fair. They are planning on putting it to a vote in June 2008, an election when there will be few other things on the ballot, and turnout is expected to be extremely low.
While reform of the electoral system is certainly needed, it must be a national process -- not an "elaborate dirty trick" to hand over the White House to the Republican presidential nominee."

Sign here.
Gov. Dean is to be commended for his leadership in the 2006 election and in the buildup to 2008. I wonder however if Pelosi’s “unprincipled position on Impeachment” and failure to stop the Iraq War will cause major defections from the Party by Grass Roots Dems, Progressives and Independents, and result in the Democrats losing both the presidency and at least one house of Congress. The agenda of Democratic Party elites is “indistinguishable from the Republican Neoconservative agenda" as Presidential Candidate Rep. Kucinich stated on August 12 on ABC's THIS WEEK . Kucinich, who won the ABC TV Poll after the last Democratic Debate, wants to Impeach Cheney. As former Salt Lake Mayor Rocky Anderson said “There should be no neutrality on impeachment. you are either for impeachment or you are for torture , due process violations, extraordinary rendition, the suspension of habease corpus, unitary executive privilege, and signing statements”.


Colorado’s Democratic Representatives, Udall, Perlmutter, Salazar, and DeGette are either for protecting the Constitution or they are not. If we cannot trust Democrats to honor their Oath to protect the Constitution how can we trust them to get us Single Payer Healthcare and the other changes they pledge to be able to provide us in 2009? MoveOn.org in an email dated 08-20-07 from Nita Chaudhary to members regarding the War said “We’ve given every member of Congess a clear choice: Vote to end the war or face political extinction”. If the Democrats don’t pay attention to the rest of us perhaps they will to MoveOn’s three million members. Watch the Dems leap to attention when MoveOn finally begins to support Impeachment. This article by Dave Lindorff at Buzzflash.org and the many Comments posted there discuss the possibility of Pelosi causing the Democrats to lose big in 2008 , and this at Democrats.Com , and this at Afterdownstreet.org.   Read More »

I can't help but wonder how much the Democrat's twin failures (to Stop The Iraq War Now and Be a Check and Balance on the Bush/ Cheney/ Gonzales depredations against our Constitution... through Impeachment) will affect the Voter perception of the Democratic Congress by November 2008.

The Democrats have given Bush much of what he asked them for and more in the area of Iraq and Wiretapping. Wonder if the cave ins will stop before the '08 Election? Excuses only go so far with voters.

This article in the Washington Post today had some good info and observations. A Rush To Frame Views on Congress
By Jonathan Weisman
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/19/AR2007081901716.html?nav=trm
MoveOn has this handy guide to the cost of war by Congressional District here.

Could be useful for a variety of issues when meeting with you local Congressional Representative.
Colorado is a cattle state.  Even ranchers who are Republicans should be able to agree on this: A ban on meat packers ownership of livestock?

MyDD.com has this on the issue and John Edwards stand:
"DesmoinesDem's post about John Edwards below highlighted his rural strategy, which includes something that most people's eyes would slide right over: A ban on meat packer ownership of livestock."
Natasha Chart, blogger for MyDD.com, writes:

"The packer ban is a very important issues to rural districts where agriculture predominates, and his championing of it has been cited as one of the reasons why the very progressive Wellstone was able to draw on such a broad base of support. This year, Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) is expected to reintroduce a version of the 2002 competition reform and packer ban as one of several supporting Senators, and in concert with Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA)."
Read the rest here.

This is a matter of food safety for all of us, and a matter of having a real marketplace for the independent, small ranchers.  We know already what happens when there is a concentration of power in the hands of a few corporations (like in mass media or oil production and distribution).

What is the position that our Colorado Senators, Salazar and Allard, have on this issue? 

Call them and tell them that we want to have a diversified food production system.





Contrary to the know-it-all pundits like Broder or Brookes and Democratic Party nitwit consultants who believe that impeachment is a "stunt" or "useless" because there isn't enough "time" or that "the people are against the idea", impeachment is the founding fathers solution our political crisis today.

As McClatchy Newspapers reports (hat tip to Talkingpointsmemo.com) Dick Cheney is urging Mr. Bush to attack Iran:
"Lea Anne McBride, a Cheney spokeswoman, said only that "the vice president is right where the president is" on Iran policy.

Bush left no doubt at his news conference that he intended to get tough with Iran."

What kind of trigger to attack?  

"Cheney, who's long been skeptical of diplomacy with Iran, argued for military action if hard new evidence emerges of Iran's complicity in supporting anti-American forces in Iraq; for example, catching a truckload of fighters or weapons crossing into Iraq from Iran, one official said."
Bamboozlement campaign of fear and revenge by Karl Rove on the American people is taking effect.  

"The Bush administration has launched what appears to be a coordinated campaign to pin more of Iraq's security troubles on Iran."

Read the rest here.

WTF?

Mr. Bush is ready to attack Iran.  Why?  Over 160,000 US soldiers in Iraq. Over 100,000 mercenaries in Iraq.  Three carrier battle groups in Persian Gulf.

It is our responsiblity and duty to stop this illegal war because it is the life of every soldier we have in our hands.


This post expresses my feelings on the Constitution and the urgent necessity for Impeachment. By rateyes @ Democratic Underground via David Swanson Afterdowningstreet.org Link=
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1527641

If I want impeachment, I am a bad Democrat, a bad progressive, a member of the looney left... a checker player instead of a chess player... yada yada yada... I really don't give a damn. And, here's why:

1. Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans give me freedom of speech. The Constitution does.   Read More »

The unilateral, go it alone policies of the current occupant of the White House are visibly crumbling.  First, there was an out-of-the box opinion by Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel to get the US away from negotiating with the Iraqi factions, and now we learn that the “decider” is passing the buck back to the UN.

 

Senator Hagel’s piece was published in the Financial Times – “A less American face for mediation in Iraq” FT.com site, Jul 02, 2007 (My home delivery subscription doesn’t include online access to the archive.  I saved it the old-fashioned way, paper - scissors.) 

Here’s the Washington Post coverage of the upcoming plea for rescue from the UN - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/07/AR2007080701076.html?wpisrc=newsletter 

The nation is in dire straights on the world stage.  The US military colleges teach young officers that one of the measures/means of national power is Diplomacy.  The early arrogance of the current occupant has arguably been replaced by silent despiration. 

Ban Ki-Moon has paid a high price for US acceptance of his taking the office of UN Secretaty-General.  He now faces the task of rescuing the current occupant form his debacle in Iraq.  Too bad that means the current mis-administration is likley to borrow the $130-million to extend the “Green-Zone” to the UN Mission in Baghdad.  The Federal Deficit “Children’s Tax” debt to the People’s Republic of China continues to grow. 

The next Democratic President of the United States of America has a huge and daunting task ahead of him/her.  It starts in 511 days.

Surprise, surpise…After taking a call-in opportunity to a Faux Noise (Fox News) radio show to reassure the Right WingNuts that all is well in Iraq, General David Petraeus is taking a beating in the Washington Post. The text of his radio comments were reported in detail and those knowledgeable of military realities have “taken-off the gloves.”

Read the article -

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/07/AR2007080701726.html

Then read how thousands are b****-slapping a 4-star -

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/07/AR2007080701726_Comments.html

The weapons fiasco is a serious blow to the credibility of the entire military mission. It comes on the heals of the “…take yer guns home boys…” disbanding of the Iraqi Army, the failure to secure Saddam’s conventional weapons stockpiles, and the dumb-founded do-nothing policies during the rise of the insurgency.

It was just 1,560 days ago that the current occupant of the White House joyfully declared the end of combat in Iraq under the glowing “Mission Accomplished” banner. The war was won, but it is becoming more and more evident that the peace is descending rapidly into catastrophe.

There is no truthful “clerical error” that could have allowed 190,000 weapons to flow unchecked into Iraq. It was definitely a loss of accountability, a compromise of integrity, and an abandoning of professionalism on the part of General Patraeus.

Just in, following our press conference today:

The head of a liberal advocacy group is accusing Republican Senate candidate Bob Schaffer of hypocrisy for advice he gave his fellow members of the state Board of Education on disclosing contributions.

ProgressNowAction executive director Michael Huttner said Schaffer told board members they should disclose donations from people doing business with the board. Huttner said Schaffer then accepted contributions to his Senate campaign from a board consultant.

Schaffer did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

Huttner said Schaffer cast the deciding vote to award a contract to a company owned by David Brennan, which provides programs for charter schools, and accepted $3,600 in contributions from Brennan for his Senate campaign.
Who wants a Justice Department that works only for the Republican Party?

The NYT's is accurate:
"One part of the Justice Department mess that requires more scrutiny is the growing evidence that the department may have singled out people for criminal prosecution to help Republicans win elections...

Putting political opponents in jail is the sort of thing that happens in third-world dictatorships. In the United States, prosecutions are supposed to be scrupulously nonpartisan...."

And sums up the scandal as:

" If Americans are being put in jail for political reasons, Congress must put a stop to it."

Read the whole opinion here.

This is why Mr. Bush will be impeached.  Not for a foreign policy based on lies and deceptions, but we will not stand for a system of justice that is based on who is in power at the moment.

Remember, the process of corruption did not begin with Abu Gonzales but with ayatollah Ashcroft at the Department of Justice.  

The Republican argument is this:  US Attorneys are political appointees. The US Attorneys are beholden not to the Constitution but only to Mr. Bush. There is nothing else to their argument.  

Question: What other national leader demanded alliegence not to their constitution but only to themself (lead their country into war based on lies, and replaced independent military men with "yes" men)?  Hint:  It is not Castro or Chavez.

This is why it was disturbing that Sen. Patrick Leahy had to correct White House Political Director Sara Taylor because she said 
that she had taken an "oath to the President" not to the Constitution.

(BTW- The parallels to the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei are unprecedented in American history by Mr. Bush and his Republican party.)

Let your media and elected representatives know the bottom line:
Impeachment is the Founding Fathers cure.



The offenses and failures of the mis-administration just continue to grow. Today's Washington Post story, "Weapons Given to Iraq Are Missing: GAO Estimates 30% of Arms Are Unaccounted For" is yet more damning evidence of how badly the current occupant of the White House has bungled his adventure in Iraq.

Here's the story - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/05/AR2007080501299.html?wpisrc=newsletter

The GAO Report - http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07711.pdf

 

   Read More »
Highest Rated All Network Posts

Lessons from a Quagmire

Posted Nov 21, 2009 12:25am
Comments (0)

Saturday Mailbag: Friday Edition

Posted Nov 20, 2009 6:08pm
Comments (0)

A battlefield in the courtroom

Posted Nov 20, 2009 4:23pm
Comments (1)

Signs of hate, right here in Denver

Posted Nov 20, 2009 1:03pm
Comments (1)

HHS Task Force Mammogram Recs Slammed

Posted Nov 19, 2009 8:52am
Comments (0)

Toddler teacher convicted for DUI on 0.00 breathalyzer and negative drug test - Adams County Justice

Posted Nov 15, 2009 2:52pm
Comments (0)

Got Defense?

Posted Nov 15, 2009 9:41am
Comments (0)

Dave Schultheis is the Worst Person in the World

Posted Nov 12, 2009 5:29pm
Comments (1)

What McInnis might say

Posted Nov 12, 2009 7:23am
Comments (0)

Veteran's Day 2009

Posted Nov 11, 2009 8:38pm
Comments (0)

* NOTE: ProgressNow Colorado is not responsible for the content of member postings.



Search Blog

Make a Donation
Find People
Find Groups
Find Events
Write Officials
Join our group on FacebookFollow us on TwitterProgressive JobwireProgressNow State Partner Colorado Blogs

National Blogs

1536 Wynkoop St., #4A, Denver, CO 80202 | ph: (303) 991-1900 | fax: (303) 991-1902 | progress@progressnowcolorado.org

© 2005-2009 ProgressNow Colorado, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Fair Use Statement. Terms of Service.