<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
     xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:ysrv="http://www.progressnowcolorado.org">
  <channel>
    <title>C L&#039;s Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.progressnowcolorado.org/page/community/blog_rss/climatelaws</link>
    <description></description>
                        <item>
            <title>An Administrative Climate Change Blueprint</title>
            <description>  cross-posted at     ClimateLaws.org       Under the neo-classic pen name, Justinian, several yet to be revealed policy and climate experts have released a  blueprint of strategies  for the incoming administration to consider with regards to climate change.&amp;nbsp; The lynchpin of these tactics is that they can all be undertaken  without the need  for immediate congressional action.&amp;nbsp; Like the Roman Emperor Justinian&amp;rsquo;s attempts to bring Rome out of the Dark Ages with, among other things, a complete revision of the Roman law code &amp;ndash; the authors&amp;rsquo; proposals offer a dramatic administrative shift in US priorities for climate change.     While some of the recommendations are fairly well known, some are wonkish administrative priority setting such as strategies within federal agencies that will permit a far greater amount of environmental policy changes to successfully navigate the myriad of interagency hurdles they often face.&amp;nbsp; Two of the more public and well known recommendations include having the US join a binding international agreement on climate change, and granting California&amp;rsquo;s exemption to EPA regulation of auto emissions essentially letting that state and 18 others raise emissions standards on automobiles.&amp;nbsp;     Some other suggestions include....more after the   jump   </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowcolorado.org/page/community/post/climatelaws/CQDR</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowcolorado.org/page/community/post/climatelaws/CQDR/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:35:16 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowcolorado.org/page/community/post/climatelaws/CQDR</guid>
            <dc:creator>User from Denver, CO</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>User from Denver, CO</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>223</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowcolorado.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQDR/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
      </channel>
</rss>